Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24148
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorKostusiak, Nataliia-
dc.contributor.authorNavalna, Maryna-
dc.contributor.authorMezhov, Oleksandr-
dc.contributor.authorLevchenko, Tetiana-
dc.contributor.authorAdamchuk, Nataliya-
dc.contributor.authorLokaichuk, Svitlana-
dc.contributor.authorDruz, Yurii-
dc.contributor.authorBuhaiova, Oksana-
dc.contributor.authorMougel, Daryna-
dc.contributor.authorKushch, Natalia-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-20T12:18:11Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-20T12:18:11Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationKostusiak N., Navalna M., Mezhov O., Levchenko T., Adamchuk N., Lokaichuk S., Druz Yu., Buhaiova O., Mougel D., Kushch N. Explicit and Implicit Representations of Possessively Marked Language Units in Contemporary Ukrainian Mass Media. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2024. Vol. 14, Issue 1, Spec. Issue XLI. P. 79–86. URL : https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140141/papers/A_13.pdf.uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24148-
dc.description.abstractThe article characterizes explicit and implicit morphological, lexical, and word-forming linguistic means involved in the implementation of invariant possessive content; the classification of these units is supplemented by their analysis in the context of syntax, primary/secondary, stylistic neutrality/emotional coloring. In the plane of leveling the semantics of possessiveness, adjectival and pronominal words subordinated to nouns with an abstract meaning, substantives denoting persons, geographical concepts, objects of general use, etc. are described. Attention is focused on some adjectives that, when they appeared in war-themed publications, gave the texts evaluative, ironic, and mocking shades and at the same time emphasized dynamic changes in the language. The functional potential of the indefinite pronoun чийсь (чиясь, чиєсь, чиїсь) (someone (someone's)) and the interrogative relative чий (whose, (whose), which are in the possessive sphere, have been revealed. It has been found that the meaning of individual belonging of an object to a person or an animal is inherent in the genitive case forms of nouns as condensed means of marking objectivity and possessiveness. In the system of implicit representatives of possessiveness, the substantives that, under the influence of external factors, underwent an expansion of the semantic structure and lost the possessive shade were analyzed. The units endowed with generalized possessive semantics include a small number of verbs that predict the presence of two substantive components – a subject and an object – in order to implement their meaning. In the context of the implicit expression of possessiveness, the formal means of the word-formative level are considered, in particular, the derived adjectives formed by the method of stem formation, and adjectival and noun suffix derivatives that arose on the basis of the contraction of sentences with a possessively marked verbal predicate are characterized.uk_UK
dc.format.extent79–86-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.relation.urihttps://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140141/papers/A_13.pdfuk_UK
dc.subjectpossessivenessuk_UK
dc.subjectexplicit/implicit means of expressionuk_UK
dc.subjectlexemeuk_UK
dc.subjectmorphological categoryuk_UK
dc.subjectderivationuk_UK
dc.subjectsuffixuk_UK
dc.subjectpredicateuk_UK
dc.subjectstylistic roleuk_UK
dc.subjectemotional coloringuk_UK
dc.titleExplicit and Implicit Representations of Possessively Marked Language Units in Contemporary Ukrainian Mass Mediauk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.citation.issue1, Spec. Issue XLI-
dc.citation.journalTitleAD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research-
dc.citation.volume14-
dc.coverage.countryCZuk_UK
dc.relation.referencesBagan, M. P. (2012). The category of negation in the Ukrainian language: functional-semantic and ethnolinguistic manifestations. Kyiv: Dmytro Burago Publishing House.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesBusel, V. T. (Ed.). (2005). A large explanatory dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language. Irpin: Perun.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesDanylchuk, I. G. (1995). The functional-semantic field of possessiveness in the modern Ukrainian language [PhD dissertation]. Odesa: Odesa state. I. I. Mechnikov University.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesDomracheva I. (2007). Qualitative-quantitative analysis of the functional-semantic field of quantity. Linguistic Studies, 15, 106–113.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Mezhov, O., Pryimachok, O., Holoiukh, L., Zdikhovska, T., Tykha, L. (2022). Concept of crisis in the latest media information field. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(1), XХV, 287–292. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ ADALTA/120125/papers/A_51.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Navalna, M., & Mezhov, O. (2020). The Functional-cognitive category of femininity in modern Ukrainian. Cognitive Studies / Études Cognitives, 20, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2310.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Navalna, M., Skliarenko, O., Masytska, T., Sydorenko, T., Pryimachok, O., & Holoiukh, L. (2023). Expression of negation in media texts during the Russian- Ukrainian War. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(1), XХХIV, 123–131. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ ADALTA/130134/papers/A_18.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Pryimachok, O., Zdikhovska, T., Shkamarda, O., Svitlikovska, O., Poliak, I. (2022). Communicative-pragmatic potential and semantic-grammatical manifestations of uncertainty in modern Ukrainian massmedia. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(1), XХVІІ, 41–46. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/120127/papers/A_09.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesKostusiak, N., Shulska, N., Lisova, Yu., Yaresko, K., Ivanova, I., Pochuieva, O., Afanasieva, O. (2023). Language verbalization of quantitativeness in modern mass media: Linguistic-cognitive and communicative-pragmatic dimensions in Ukrainian language. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(1), XХХIV, 149–155. http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ ADALTA/130134/papers/A_22.pdf.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesMishenina, T. M. (2005). Structural and semantic features of syntactic constructions of possessiveness in the modern Ukrainian language. [PhD thesis brief]. Kyiv: Kyiv National Pedagogical University named after M. P. Drahomanov.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesPoliak, I. P. (2019). Functional-semantic category of insignificance in modern Ukrainian literary language. [PhD thesis]. Lutsk: Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesSikorska, O. O. (2017). Functional-semantic category of potentiality in the Ukrainian language. [PhD dissertation brief]. Odesa: Odesa National University named after I. I. Mechnikov.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesTkachuk, T. P. (2009). Functional-semantic category of admissibility in the modern Ukrainian language. [PhD dissertation brief]. Kyiv: Institute of the Ukrainian Language of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesVakaliuk, I. V. (2019). Functional-semantic category of verbal quantitative in the modern Ukrainian literary language. [PhD dissertation]. Ivano-Frankivsk: State higher educational establishment “Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University”.uk_UK
dc.relation.referencesVyhovanets, I. R., Horodenska, K. G., Zagnitko, A. P., Sokolova, S. O. (2017). Grammar of modern Ukrainian literary language. Kyiv: Ed. Dmytro Burago's house.uk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:Наукові роботи (FFG)

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
A_13.pdf488,51 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.