Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23448
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKabakčiev, Krasimir-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-04T11:14:49Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-04T11:14:49Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-28-
dc.identifier.citationThis paper deals with Bulgarian съм+-л (‘be’+past active participle) perfect verb forms with aorist and imperfect participles, the distinction between these two participles being a phenomenon found only in Bulgarian among the Slavic languages and generally absent in other languages too. According to the majority of Bulgarianists today, imperfect participles are not used in perfect verb forms. However, this thesis is considered here a fully defective one for several reasons, among which: no argumentation has ever been provided to explain the thesis in essence – for example, in its possible connection to the aspectual values encoded in aorist and imperfect participles, or to the general characteristics of съм+-л forms. These forms can effectuate many TAM meanings – not only of “a standard perfect” but also modal ones such as inferentiality, renarration, dubitativity. Following the author’s definition of aspect as an all-pervading and perpetual process of mapping temporal features between verbal and nominal referents, specific uses of imperfect and aorist participles in sentences with perfect verb forms are analyzed, and the impact the relevant participle (imperfect or aorist) exerts on the temporal values of situation-participant NP-referents is analyzed and identified. The major generalization is that the never-ending process of mapping temporal features from verbs to nominals (NPs) that occurs in verbal-aspect languages (Slavic, Greek, Georgian), and vice versa, from nominals (NPs) to verbs that occur in compositional-aspect languages (Dutch, English, Finnish) is a crucial psychophysiological mechanism ingrained in peoples’ heads and conditioning the development of grammatical structures of languages. Intriguingly, this process is linguistically fully identifiable at the speaker-hearer interaction level but remains entirely beyond the awareness of the ordinary native speaker.uk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23448-
dc.description.abstractThis paper deals with Bulgarian съм+-л (‘be’+past active participle) perfect verb forms with aorist and imperfect participles, the distinction between these two participles being a phenomenon found only in Bulgarian among the Slavic languages and generally absent in other languages too. According to the majority of Bulgarianists today, imperfect participles are not used in perfect verb forms. However, this thesis is considered here a fully defective one for several reasons, among which: no argumentation has ever been provided to explain the thesis in essence – for example, in its possible connection to the aspectual values encoded in aorist and imperfect participles, or to the general characteristics of съм+-л forms. These forms can effectuate many TAM meanings – not only of “a standard perfect” but also modal ones such as inferentiality, renarration, dubitativity. Following the author’s definition of aspect as an all-pervading and perpetual process of mapping temporal features between verbal and nominal referents, specific uses of imperfect and aorist participles in sentences with perfect verb forms are analyzed, and the impact the relevant participle (imperfect or aorist) exerts on the temporal values of situation-participant NP-referents is analyzed and identified. The major generalization is that the never-ending process of mapping temporal features from verbs to nominals (NPs) that occurs in verbal-aspect languages (Slavic, Greek, Georgian), and vice versa, from nominals (NPs) to verbs that occur in compositional-aspect languages (Dutch, English, Finnish) is a crucial psychophysiological mechanism ingrained in peoples’ heads and conditioning the development of grammatical structures of languages. Intriguingly, this process is linguistically fully identifiable at the speaker-hearer interaction level but remains entirely beyond the awareness of the ordinary native speaker.uk_UK
dc.format.extent48–60-
dc.language.isoukuk_UK
dc.publisherLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
dc.subjectBulgarian perfectuk_UK
dc.subjectaorist and imperfect participlesuk_UK
dc.subjecttemporal values of situation-participant NPsuk_UK
dc.subjectspeakers’ unawareness of NP temporal valuesuk_UK
dc.titleOn the Temporal Values of Situation-Participant NP Referents Mapped from Bulgarian Perfects with Aorist and Imperfect Participlesuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.rights.holderEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2023uk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.kab-
dc.contributor.affiliationAthens Institute for Education and Research, Greeceuk_UK
dc.coverage.countryUAuk_UK
dc.coverage.placenameLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
Appears in Collections:East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2023, Volume 10, Number 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
eejpl_10_1_2023_Kabakciev.pdf363,7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.