Будь ласка, використовуйте цей ідентифікатор, щоб цитувати або посилатися на цей матеріал: https://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/19485
Повний запис метаданих
Поле DCЗначенняМова
dc.contributor.authorZarichna, Olena-
dc.contributor.authorBuchatska, Svitlana-
dc.contributor.authorMelnyk, Liudmyla-
dc.contributor.authorSavchuk, Tetiana-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-28T13:36:47Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-28T13:36:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationZarichna O., Buchatska S., Melnyk L., Savchuk T. Content and Language Integrated Learning in Tertiary Education: Perspectives on Terms of Use and Integration / O. Zarichna, S. Buchatska, L. Melnyk, T. Savchuk // East European Journal of Psycholinguistics / Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University. – Lutsk, 2020. – Volume 7, Number 1 – P. 184-198.https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.zaruk_UK
dc.identifier.urihttps://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/19485-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on a classroom investigation into a tertiary variation of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) as well as addresses the conceptual and methodological parameters of this method as distinguished from the other two content-based English-taught courses: ESP and EMI. A special challenge for this research was to study the functionality of CLIL in the university settings in terms of content retention and language acquisition as well as the development of communicative culture in university students. With this purpose we conducted a pilot project on CLIL also designing a triple vector observation scheme (content retention; language acquisition; communication culture) and adding the high order thinking skills dimension as a pivotal learning goal in a CLIL-based English classroom. The project comprised 8 syllabi-based sub-modules that featured scientific content and was conducted among 78 humanities majors. Findings show that students’ cognitive and communicative needs do not find sufficient support in the existing L2 courses to which CLIL may serve as a solution. Introduction of CLIL even at the level of a variable sub-module may considerably raise students’ satisfaction with L2 courses and provide a reliable backing in the development of their academic thinking and communicative culture.-
dc.format.extent184-198-
dc.language.isoenuk_UK
dc.publisherLesya Ukrainka Eastern European National Universityuk_UK
dc.subjectContent and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)uk_UK
dc.subjectEnglish for Specific Purposes (ESP)uk_UK
dc.subjectEnglish as a Medium of Instruction (EMI)uk_UK
dc.subjectcontent-based instructionuk_UK
dc.subjectBasic Interpersonal Communication System (BICS)uk_UK
dc.subjectCognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP)uk_UK
dc.subjecthigh order thinking skillsuk_UK
dc.titleContent and Language Integrated Learning in Tertiary Education: Perspectives on Terms of Use and Integrationuk_UK
dc.typeArticleuk_UK
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.zar-
dc.citation.journalTitleEast European Journal of Psycholinguistics-
dc.contributor.affiliationVinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynsky State Pedagogical University, Ukraineuk_UK
dc.coverage.countryUAuk_UK
Розташовується у зібраннях:East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2020, Volume 7, Number 1

Файли цього матеріалу:
Файл Опис РозмірФормат 
13_EEJPL_7_1_2020_.pdf.pdf359,56 kBAdobe PDFПереглянути/відкрити


Усі матеріали в архіві електронних ресурсів захищені авторським правом, всі права збережені.